top of page
blur - yellow.png

Designing the visual language
of John Deere digtial.

I’m a UX designer focused on design systems: components, icons, typography, guidelines, and the cross-surface infrastructure that keeps a 187-year-old company visually coherent across web, mobile, and print. The two case studies below are zoom-ins on that broader work at John Deere.

Card - Type.png
Card - Color.png
Card Component.png
Card - Grid Pattern.png
Card - Buttons.png
Version label.png
Card - Guideline.png
Card - Illustration.png
Card - Icons.png

 ROLE

UX Designer II

Design System Designer

TENURE

Dec 2023 - Present

2.6 years at John Deere

REACH

20+ product teams

3 business unit

SURFACES

Web · Mobile · Print

One coherent language

Blur - green.png
Blur - green.png

ABOUT THE COMPANY

187 years old.

130 countries.

One digital surface.

I joined John Deere in December 2023 as a UX designer II on the Mobile & Web design systems team, the small group responsible for the components, icons, typography, and documentation that 20+ product teams build on.

 

My role spans the unglamorous infrastructure work - auditing existing patterns, defining new primitives, writing usage rules, and pairing with engineering until what ships matches the spec. The case studies below zoom into two of the deepest projects on that surface.

JDImageWithFallback.png

THE DIGITAL DESIGN SYSTEM

One foundation. Twenty Product teams.

A comprehensive design foundation powers every customer-facing application at John Deere - from Ops Center to Equipment Mobile, dealer portals, and internal tools. Over 2.6 years, I contributed to its evolution across three pillars.

Different Screen Sizes Illustartions.png
Systems thinker

I work in patterns, tokens, and primitives, not pages. If two surfaces need the same thing twice, that's a missing component, not a duplicate task.

Cross-surface fluency

Web, native, and print are different mediums with different unit systems. The same component model has to translate cleanly across all three.

Design–engineering pairing

Parity isn't earned in Figma, it's earned by sitting next to the engineer until the rendered output matches the spec. I keep that loop tight.

WHAT I WORK ON

The system, in six initiatives.

My day-to-day spans the full surface of John Deere’s design system — the two case studies below are the deepest, but here’s the full picture of where my work shows up.

CASE STUDY 01

Equipment Icon System

140+ icons · 3 BUs

Led the rebuild of the equipment icon library used across every John Deere customer surface, replacing inconsistent, toy-like artwork with a precise, photo-grounded system.

CASE STUDY 04

iPad Layout Patterns

Net-new territory

Defined the first tablet-specific layout patterns, login & home navigation with templates & guidance on what works and what doesn't on iPad. Referenced by many tablet & mobile designers ahead of component release.

CASE STUDY 02

PDF Report Library

3 BUs · Web + Print

Shared component library that lets web design tokens render as PDFs. Owned the header and footer hand-off, achieving 90% Figma ↔ dev parity.

CASE STUDY 05

Guidelines & Documentation

Reference library

Authored usage rules, accessibility notes, and adoption playbooks. Unglamorous, but it's the work that keeps a global enterprise from re-litigating the same decisions every quarter.

CASE STUDY 03

Component Contributions

20+ teams consuming

Audited, refined, and published components in the ISG Component Library, the layer every product team imports from. Kept Figma and the repo in sync as a single source of truth.

CASE STUDY 06

Tokens & Foundations

Cross-surface

Contributed to the shared color, spacing, and elevation tokens that underpin every component and the token bridge that keeps web and print speaking the same language.

CASE STUDY 01 - EQUIPMENT ICON SYSTEM

01 - Rebuilding
the equipment
icon system.

I redesign equipment icons used across John Deere’s digital ecosystem - replacing toy-like, inconsistent artwork with a precise, scalable system grounded in real product photography.

Old icon vs Photo vs New icon.png

The same 9RX tractor rendered in the old system, in the product photograph it represents, and in the redesigned icon.

THE TEAM

A two-designer pod, serving many

product teams.

Over 2.6 years, our two-person design team redesigned 1000+ icons including 140+ equipment icons, shipped 100+ components, and rebuilt the contribution models, request models so the system could keep up with the org.

MY ROLE

01

Led visual designs for Report Library and Icon systems for ISG Digital library.

02

Authored Research and documentation for usage guidelines

03

Worked with engineering for design-to-code fidelity and delivery

04

Supported product teams adopting the systems

Bailey & me.HEIC

BAILEY HIGGINS (L) . SHREYA JAIN (R)

MARCH 2025

THE PROBLEM

Why this matters.

The Operations Center has  Home, Map, Setup, Plan & Analyze tools where farmers, dealers, and technician's daily workflow lives in. It surfaces up to 60 icons on average on a single screen. Out of which one-third are equipment icons. When those icons misrepresent the equipment they stand for, trust erodes fast.

"There's a big product launch in the construction division history for our JD designed excavators. Please match all icons so it wouldn't take the historical style & form"

- Global product manager, JD Construction & Forestry

"When a farmer calls about their 9RX tractor, the icon needs to match what's in their field."

- Dealer support lead, internal interview

"Existing icons were squashed to fit a square. A combine read like a child's toy, not a $750K machine."

Distorted Proportions

On average, a single Operations Center Home screen contains around   60 icons. Nearly one-third of them are equipment icons.

Home Page.png
Map Page.png

AUDIT & PRIORITIZATION

We didn't redesign randomly.

With the help of engineering team, we pulled 90 days of usage telemetry from the Operations Center and ranked every icon by appearance count. The top 12 icons accounted for 78% of all impressions, they shipped first. Strategic impact: Shipping high-usage icons first delivered visible improvement to 500K+ users within 8 weeks, while the long tail followed a documented system anyone could extend.

MY APPROACH

Three principles. Every decision.

Before drawing anything, I aligned the team on the principles below. They became the rubric we used in every review.

Accuracy Over Aesthetics

Icons must represent real equipment models and proportions. A beautiful icon that misrepresents the machine confuses customers and erodes trust.

"When a customer calls about their 9RX tractor, the icon needs to match what's in their field."

Optimize for Recognition

Users scan dashboards at 24px. Exaggerate distinctive features (tracks, booms, headers) while reducing non-essential detail.

"If you can't tell a combine from a sprayer at thumbnail size, it's not working."

Enable Others to Succeed

Documentation, templates, and guidelines allow designers and engineers to extend the system without bottlenecking on one person.

"The system is successful when I'm not needed to create the next icon."

VISUAL RULES & LOGIC

The system itself.

The real work of a design system is the constraints. I defined a 48×48 base grid, pixel-snapping rules, and a callout pattern that lets any designer draw a new machine without inventing a new style.

Visual Rules & Logic

The core of design systems work, establishing constraints that enable consistency at scale.

Grid & Pixel Precision Image

-  All icons live on a standard art board with pixel-snapping enforced.

Boolean groups Image

Every shape is kept intact in a working file for any future changes.

Patterns & Similarities Image

Shared parts were drawn only once, resued everywhere.

PROCESS

Process & Workflow

A scalable process that reduces rework and lets the team work in parallel. Each icon passes through the same nine gates.

Icon Process & Workflow.png

ITERATIONS & TRADE-OFFS

What I got wrong, and what I changed.

The strongest signal that a system is working is how it survives its first contradictions. Three of the calls that took the longest to make:

Project trade-off Information - 1
Project trade-off Information - 2
Project trade-off Information - 3

OUTCOME & IMPACT

What it shipped, what it changed.

The system is in production and self-sustaining. Most importantly, the next icon doesn't need me.

140+

Equipment icons shipped

Live in Figma library & Storybook

7 days

New icon turnaround

Down from 15 - 20 days a/c pre-system

500k+

Users impacted

Operation Center monthly actives

New System

Style Guidelines & New workflow system created

Nothing ever existed before.

91%

Recognition accuracy

Up from 54% from previous launch

AI efficient

To be efficient we used VS Code to optimize our SVG files.

Constantly exploring AI tools & agents to drive innovation.

Project Result Image
My contribution & learnings. Owned. Partenered. Growth.

REFLECTION

What I'd do differently.

Start with system, not the first icon

I spent three weeks polishing the row-crop tractor before locking the grid rules. When the rules tightened, I rebuilt it. Next time the constraints come first, the hero icon second.

Bring stakeholder in at week one.

Prioritizing conventions came up late. A 30-minute conversation with the platform stakeholder in week one would have saved a week of cleanup later.

UP NEXT

Teaching a web system to speak print. Building reusable PDF report components for ISG digital teams.

bottom of page